I don’t believe that social mobility can only be obtained trough education. I am a firm believer in if you work hard you will become successful. Yes a high school education is important, but if you are a person that has a talent or a skill, it is perfectly fine to not go to college and create your success with this skill. My brother in law is a great example of this, he never finished regular high school but instead became a builder, and now has his own business. He has to work hard but he enjoys it and can live comfortable life. I hear from friends with Master degrees that they can’t find a job, 10 years ago a job would have been a guarantee for them after graduation, now it will become a luxury. ADAM DAVIDSON writes in the NY times, “One of the greatest changes is that a college degree is no longer the guarantor of a middle-class existence” (Davidson, 2011). When I graduate, I may have to start at the bottom just like everyone else without a degree. But if I work hard, and try my best at everything that is thrown at me, I believe that I will one day be successful. “Though it’s no guarantee, a B.A. or some kind of technical training is at least a prerequisite for a decent salary” (Davidson, 2011). A college degree will help you don’t get me wrong, but it is no longer a ticket out of poverty or a guaranteed ticket to middle class.
Souces
Davidson, A. (2011, November 23). The Dwindling Power of a College Degree. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/magazine/changing-rules-for-success.html?pagewanted=all
N/A. (2011, August 25). Researchers state only 40 Years of Oil and 65 Years of Gas Left. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.bionomicfuel.com: http://www.bionomicfuel.com/researchers-state-only-40-years-of-oil-and-65-years-of-gas-left/
Ann-Sophie,
Excellent!
Since we are in an economic crisis, what about having an opportunity? Do you know our society is really about ‘who you know’ versus ‘what you know?’ In you are born into an affluent family in America, doesn’t this fact increase your opportunities versus a poor kid in rural America?
Professor Green
One fundamental problem that needs to be addressed when speaking of STEM college graduation rates is public school funding. Schools, whose budgets are malleable, have been asked to cut a total of 13.7 percent, on average, since 2007 (Santos, 2011). Principles must make decisions on what programs to cut spending. Science is an expensive program for public schools and just like all other school programs the science department is taking a financial loss. The reduction in spending does not allow for students to use updated tools, instruments, and experiments to help create interest. Many private organizations are trying to tackle the shortfall of STEM graduates by donating to science centers, local public schools, and creating centers designating in promoting STEM. These programs are great for young kids but the root of the problem falls back to government funding, or lack thereof, for public schools.
Reference:
Santos, F. (2011, August 17). Lessons in austerity: How principles make budgets work. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/18/nyregion/five-new-york-city-school-principals-talk-budget-cuts.html?_
“It is time to restore science to its rightful place, . . . and to wield technology’s wonders to meet the demand of a new age.” That was a quote from President Obama. His quote is hard to achieve when funding to STEM programs are continuously reduced in public schools. The newest initiative is for private organizations to start donating money to STEM programs. The most frequently identified funding sources were grants from private foundations (31.9%) and district-led initiatives (25.9%) (Stemreports, 2011). I would predict that this number will continue to grow in the future because of public school funding being cut and the private sector trying to fill the gaps.
Reference:
http://www.stemreports.com/2011/stem-where-is-the-funding/
Chris,
I couldn’t agree with you more about public funding. With increased support and funding, schools can help improve the education they provide in the fields of STEM, they can strengthen the skills of teachers with additional training, therefore allowing students entering college to have a solid background and foundation in STEM to help propel them towards seeking a career in these fields. According to a new study, “most college students studying for degrees in science, technology, engineering or math make the decision to do so in HIGH SCHOOL or even before. However, only 20% say they feel that their education before college prepared them ‘extremely well’ for those fields, according to a a STEM Survey released by Microsoft and polling company Harris Interactive.
References:
Microsoft. (2011). Stem percep ons: Student & parent study. Retrieved from http://www.stemreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Microsoft-STEM-Report.pdf
I believe that social mobility is contingent on a person’s ability to compete in the market. Just as businesses strive to have a sustainable competitive advantage, so should individuals. When a person can differentiate his/herself so that he/she is indispensable, this will make his/her more desirable to his/her employers. The more indispensable one is to his/her employer, the greater the chance of social mobility to take place.
Regarding the sciences, I am saddened hear that less students seem motivated to pursue these careers. According to Dr. Mel Schiavelli’s article “STEM Education Benefits All,” he states, “Innovation today still requires a scientifically literate population and a robust supply of qualified graduates. Unfortunately, a recent report from Tapping America’s Potential (TAP), a coalition of 16 of the nation’s leading business organizations, shows that the U.S. is losing its ability to innovate and, in effect, its ability to compete.”
This is so upsetting to hear. Are students today not as motivated to keep up with science as they once were? What variables are contributing to this lack of innovation? Perhaps they need more concrete evidence to support that becoming involved in these fields will propel them socially.
Reference:
Schiavelli, M. (2005). STEM education benefits all.
The quote by Frederick Herzberg, “If you want people motivated to do a good job, give them a good job to do,” (Glo-Bus. Com, 2012) is a great example of how important it is for manager, supervisors, and CEO’s to make sure they hire the best employees for individual task. If you want to be one of these employees then you need a good education and utilize the knowledge as a tool to help you work hard. Companies also need to incorporate “best practices,” which is any practice that has proved to work particularly well for their products, finances, and strategies. (Glo-Bus. Com, 2012). Our next generation needs to learn that the world does not owe them a living, but rather they have to work for what they want, and a good education helps them achieve their goals.
References:
GLO-BUS Premium. (2012). GLO-BUS Premium Business Interaction Game. STRATEGY: Core Concepts and analytical Approaches. Chapter 7, pp 135. Retrieved at http://www.glo-bus.com/DocViwer/# on March 7, 2012.
I agree with the sentiment in this article regarding the decline of social mobility and the widening of the gap between the rich and the poor. As the article alluded, the driving factor for these changes may be the technological change itself, which has decreased the demand for middle skilled workers. An article in the Economist suggests that, “compared with people in other rich countries, Americans tend to accept relatively high levels of income inequality because they believe they may move up over time. The evidence is that America does offer opportunity; but not nearly as much as its citizens believe. Different groups of Americans have different levels of opportunity. Those born to the middle class have about an equal chance of moving up or down the income ladder, according to the Economic Mobility Project. But those born to black middle-class families are much more likely than their white counterparts to fall in rank.” In order to combat this trend, governmental policies must aid in equalizing opportunity for Americans and I believe the best method is through education. President Obama’s college loan bill is a great example of such a policy as it hopes to raise graduation rates.
April 15, 2010. Social Mobility and Inequality. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/15908469
Leave A Reply
Speaking in generalities, social mobility is centered on education. If people from a lower economic class want to attain social mobility they must attain some sort of training/education. Skills, training, and education go hand in hand with the amount of income citizens will earn. According to a study by ABC, a big factor: educational attainment. Among middle-class Americans with college degrees, 75 percent say they’re “comfortably” middle class or even moving up; 25 percent are struggling. But among those without a college degree, this poll for “ABC World News With Diane Sawyer” finds that about twice as many, 49 percent, are fighting to hold their place. Education relates to income, and it’s less well-off people in the middle class who are more likely to be struggling to stay there (Langer, 2010). The American dream is still attainable in this country but people must be willing to work for it through education, hard work, and determination.
Reference:
Langer, G. (2010). The comeback: New poll shows concerns of american middle class. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/WN/abc-world-news-poll-us-middle-class-concerns/story?id=10088470
Chris,
Excellent! I do believe an education provides more opportunities.
Sadly, individuals need to be strategic in their career objectives during this economic crisis. Some areas are saturated in certain fields like communications.
Yet, people run away from STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) like it is a disease. There are numerous opportunities in STEM. What can change this mindset about these difficult fields for American children?
Professor Green