Morgan, thanks for sharing. You have put the spotlight on managers accepting criticism, and for good reason. As managers we set an example for a department or team, but we need to be careful not to let our “importance” get in the way of learning. For example, if I am spearheading a project for PFJ and I find myself navigating an inefficient path towards an objective I need to be careful not to become defensive should a subordinate correct me or suggest alternative paths. Criticism dealt appropriately is a learning experience. As managers we should recognize constructive criticism for what it is, and rather than retaliate in some negative way, we should recognize those that steer the department/team in a better direction.
Morgan, I couldn’t agree more with you. There can be such a fine line between constructive criticism and a flat out harsh statement. A lot of times when a certain situation is not handled correctly, instead of blowing up and accusing the employee of what they did wrong, it might be handle better if you simply ask them how they might have handled that same situation a little differently. By having the employee reflect back on the situation and maybe giving them advice will most likely help prevent these situations from occurring in the future.
Leave A Reply
My 10 years of work experience at Pilot Flying J has exposed me to a wide variety of management types. The concept I have taken away from my experiences with these managers more than any other is the distinct difference between leading and managing. GE, between 1981 and 2001, under the leadership of CEO Jack Welch witnessed their stock price 4,000%. Jack Welch was a transformational leader that emphasized people-developing as the primary driver of success. His emphasis on retaining only individuals that could both give and receive candid feedback was foundational to his success. All companies, including Pilot Flying J, can benefit from implementing leadership-centric hiring practices.
I agree 100% Caleb, with Mr. Welch’s policy for maintaining his employees pertaining highly to those characteristics. It seems as though a test or some sort of personality structure should be laid out before an associate is hired, in order to exemplify exactly how well the individual can lead and take direction. Heen and Stone make a valid point, “Improving the skills of the feedback giver won’t accomplish much if the receiver isn’t able to absorb what is said. It is the receiver who controls whether feedback is let in or kept out, who has to make sense of what he or she is hearing, and who decides whether or not to change. People need to stop treating feedback only as something that must be pushed and instead improve their ability to pull”. Mr. Welch must have had a keen eye for these types of people. I believe it is essential to every day life tasks, but especially in the work environment, to hold both traits: the push and the pull.
Heen, S., & Stone, D. (2014). Find the Coaching in Criticism. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 108-111.